Google Ads · Demand capture

Google Ads for demand you've already earned.

Google catches intent you created elsewhere. High-intent category keywords, competitor queries, and branded defense. That's where B2B Google still works, and the playbook Google's own reps keep pushing, broad match, Performance Max, auto-applied recommendations, almost always makes it work less.

Book a call Run the 10-question scorecard
Ggoogle.com/search?q=linear vs jira
SPONSOREDyourapp.com › compare
Linear vs Jira: Honest Comparison (2026)
Side-by-side features, pricing, and what 200 engineering teams actually migrated to. Free comparison guide, no email required.
SPONSOREDcompetitor.com
The #1 Jira Alternative. 14-day Trial
Switch from Jira in under an hour. Used by 50,000+ teams. Start free.
linear.app › blog
Linear vs Jira: which is right for your team
Compare workflows, pricing tiers, and integrations...
reddit.com › r/productivity
Anyone moved from Jira to Linear? Worth it?
Been using Jira for 4 years, the team is getting restless...
9%

of B2B buyers start their software search on Google.

72%

still come back to Google to validate before buying.

4.3×

higher close-rate on "[vendor] vs" queries than broad category terms.

€1,840

average CAC across active Google Ads clients.

The strategic shift

Google went from discovery to verification.

AI, communities, and peer recommendations replaced Google as the starting point. But Google is still the last stop before a contract is signed. Your account should reflect that.

The 2020 playbook

then
  • Broad-match informational keywords ("project management software")
  • Generic landing pages optimized for MQLs
  • Max Conversions bidding on form-fills
  • Performance Max as the default
  • Reporting on CTR, impression share, CPL
  • Display + search on the same account

The 2026 playbook

now
  • Branded defense + "[vendor] vs" + bottom-funnel intent
  • Per-query landing pages (no generic "schedule a demo")
  • Target CPA or tROAS bidding on closed-won signal
  • Manual search campaigns with SKAGs / theme-tight ad groups
  • Reporting on SQLs, opportunities, closed-won pipeline
  • Display / Performance Max turned off unless proven
A point of view

Google's own advice, mostly wrong for B2B.

Your Google rep's job is to move you into products Google needs to grow. Broad match, Performance Max, auto-apply. None of that is designed for a 6-month sales cycle, 4 decision-makers, and a €40k ACV. The B2B accounts that work run the opposite playbook.
Google pushesBroad match keywords
We usePhrase & exact match, tight SKAGs
Broad burns budget on "free crm", "jira alternative reddit", and 900 other intent-adjacent queries. B2B budgets are too small and deal cycles too long to train algorithms on volume alone.
Google pushesPerformance Max campaigns
We useSearch-only, manual placements
PMax hides which query, placement, audience or asset drove the conversion. In B2B that's not "AI optimisation", it's a budget black box. When 10 closed-won deals a year pay for the account, you need to know which 10 clicks mattered.
Google pushesAuto-apply recommendations
We useWeekly manual review, recommendations off
"Add these 47 keywords", "expand to similar audiences", "enable broad match on exact campaigns". Each one is a revenue event for Google, a dilution event for you. We turn all of it off on day one.
Google pushesOptimise for "conversions"
We useOffline conversion import from CRM
If Google only sees form fills, Google trains towards form-fillers: researchers, students, job-seekers, competitors. When SQLs, opportunities and closed-won get pushed back into the account, the algorithm optimises for the buyers sales actually wants.
Google pushesDemand Gen / Discovery campaigns
We useLinkedIn for demand, Google for capture
Gmail + YouTube + Discover feed does not convince a VP of Engineering to evaluate your observability platform. LinkedIn does the generation work; Google does the capture work. Don't confuse the two just because one vendor sells both.
The campaign stack

Six campaigns, in this order.

We run the same structure across every B2B SaaS account we've audited, in rough priority order. The first three cover 70% of pipeline.
01

Branded defense

Your own brand + variations. Lowest CPC on the account, highest conversion rate. Competitors bid on your name, so you outrank them. Cheapest pipeline you'll ever buy.

[yourbrand] · [yourbrand] pricing · [yourbrand] login · [yourbrand] vs
02

Competitor conquesting

Bid on your top 3 to 5 competitor names. Pair with a landing page that does a fair, specific comparison, not a hit-piece. Convert the "anyone else?" moment.

[competitor] alternative · [competitor] pricing · [competitor] reviews
03

"Vs" comparison terms

The highest-intent keyword class in B2B SaaS. Someone typing "[A] vs [B]" is in a shortlist. Own every variation with dedicated landing pages.

[you] vs [competitor A] · [comp A] vs [comp B] · best [category] 2026
04

Bottom-funnel category terms

Not "project management software", but "project management software for [industry]" or "open source [category] tool". Long-tail, intent-rich, cheaper than head terms.

[category] for [vertical] · [category] with [integration] · enterprise [category]
05

Use-case / JTBD queries

"How to do X" phrased as a buying intent. Works when paired with a solution landing page that shows the outcome in the first scroll.

how to automate [workflow] · [job] without [pain] · [outcome] tool
06

Remarketing & RLSA

Custom bids for anyone who visited your pricing, comparison, or signup pages. Usually our #2 ROAS line item, right under branded.

Previous visitors × in-market audiences × specific page URL
Keyword selection

Not all queries are worth money.

A snapshot from a live audit we ran last quarter. We kill the top rows, defend the bottom ones, and reinvest the savings into intent-rich terms.
Keyword Intent CPC avg. Action
"best crm software" Top funnel €18.40 Kill
"what is crm" Informational €6.20 Kill
"hubspot alternative" Bottom funnel €11.80 Scale
"salesforce vs hubspot pricing" Bottom funnel €14.50 Scale
"[your brand]" Brand €0.40 Always on
"open source crm for agencies" Long-tail €4.10 Test
"free crm trial" Mid-funnel €8.90 Test narrow
The pattern we see

A typical before/after.

The shape of the turnaround we see most often on inherited accounts. Broad-match + Performance Max leaking spend on informational queries, rebuilt around branded defense, competitor, and "vs" campaigns.
Typical engagement shape
"Audit, kill, rebuild, measure." A full teardown in week one, a clean structure in week two, and pipeline attribution from week three. Same media spend, different intent mix, different reporting.
D
Demandgap method
How every Google engagement starts
Informational spend cut
40% 0%
"Vs" campaign share
0% 35%
Attribution depth
CPL SQL
Investment

What it actually costs.

Hourly billing, capped monthly. Your media spend goes directly to Google with no markup. You see the timesheet at month-end.

Google-only retainer

For teams whose pipeline depends on winning verification searches, or who inherited a bloated account that needs rebuilding.

  • Full account rebuild: SKAG / theme-tight ad groups
  • Branded + competitor + "vs" campaigns, in that order
  • Per-campaign landing page briefs
  • Negatives library & query cleanup (weekly)
  • Offline conversion import from HubSpot / Salesforce
  • Bi-weekly 60-min strategy calls + Slack
  • Monthly time-tracked invoice (capped)
From
€2,100/mo
Time-tracked at €150/h. Min. ad spend €5k/mo.
Book a call
30-min intro call

Want to see where your Google budget is leaking?

Send us read-only access. We'll come back with the top 3 leaks, the campaigns to kill, and an honest take on whether we'd take the project.

Book a call Run the 10-question scorecard See all services